Holy shit, Japan makes some weird porn, about the only descent thing they contribute to the world.

I love reading the “rants and raves” of craigslist periodically to get a better feeling of what the social current is within the United States. This particular post hits the nail on the head for how asian americans really view the country they live in.

being asian and american is a farce why?

because asians care about education but give nothing back to the country.

asians do not believe in serving in the United States military unless there’s some kind of benefit for us.

basically, we were raised to be asian but at the same time we cherry pick what we think of as american and in turn it only sugar coates the asianness.
why do i say this?
asian culture is hierarchical and asians never head enough psychological independence to say white is not right. So trying to be white which is what most educated asians try to be in the states is a way to inflate the asian elitist mentality. asians were bred to live in a communism state and now democracy has caused most asians to depart from real commmunities, neglect those that were left behind and struggling, seek shelther in suburbs, and ignore issues that affect the world and the impoverished.

Asian americans in my opinion have no backbone whatsoever. Just too scared of getting their feelings hurt and because of that asians will never be real world leaders in terms of human rights and social equality.

If asian americans really considered themselves american they would spend more time trying to make a difference in broken communities, but my observation is that this doesn’t occur because we only look out for ourselves, the family, and nobody else. maybe if we were back in asia. i know i’m rambling but let’s face it, 90% of asians that immigrate to the states could care less about contributing anything positive to America.

so to the person that posted that meaningless youtube clip of the girl just stop it. what message are you trying to convey? the fact the an asian girl can speak english, how wonderful another asian drone that only strives to work in a cubicle. try posting something with more substance you dense fool.

Give them nothing, Take from them everything.

I have always said that the biggest threat to the United States of America is the influx of asian peoples are are nothing more than self serving leeches on our society. They contribute nothing to American society overall, and have a general disdain for the country in which they live.  One day the American people will wakeup and dscover that the real criminals of this country are the asian and jewish peoples, but instead they focus on the poor european and african immigrants who actually consider this country their home and have routinely defended it in wartime.

America had its chance to realize just how dangerous the asian mind was with the VT killings, but very few actually woke up to this massive threat.

Man, I fucking hate sports and I’ll even tell you why!

Sports are a pointless endevour. The proponents of sports will tell you that sports teach youth as well as adults valuable lessons about team work, team spirit, and is challenging. While this may be true, they seem to think that sports is the ONLY way one could be challenged physically or learn how to work within a team. The problem i have with most traditional sports is that they are self-serving. Sports itself has turned into just another facet of the entertainment industry, which generates billions of dollars a year through advertising and sponsorship of sports teams and players. These people embody virtually none of the values of the socities of which they come, and are poorly educated, arrogant, and extremely ignorant. Any one who has watched a post-game interview knows exactly what I’m talking about. The real physical and mental athletes of the world are the professional soldiers who must use mind and body, and often times use the mind to overcome their body in order to surmount what seems impossible. Pilots, soldiers, astronauts and the like are the true embodiments of what a athelete truly is, using the mind and body as one seemless machine to overcome obstacles. These individuals also embody many of the cultural values we were taught to respect yet remain humble and modest.

However apparently what they do isn’t entertaining enough for the masses, so instead we plop some 230lb cocaine sniffing, wife cheating/beating, steroid using jackass up on the big screen for all of society to see and attempt to emulate.

Other than its players, my additional problem with sports is that most sports are self serving and serve absolutely no real tangible benefit to society at all. For example, most sports revolve around putting a round spherical object in someone else (usually the opponents domain) and then running around like a jackass to celebrate. In contrast lest popular sports such as marksmanship, race car driving, martial arts may actually contribute to society by giving us improvements in automotive technology, tangible skills to be passed on to the military industry, or self defense strategies. All modern sports does for society is provide yet another form of entertainment, like another circus put on by the Roman government so that its sheople citizens will not notice that their society is crumbling around them.

I couldn’t believe this, the guy is still president-elect and he’s already creating measures to restrict firearm ownership in his own cabinet. The guy is a fucking socialist, through and through!

Gun Owners Not Welcome on Obama’s White House Team?
Friday, November 14, 2008
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor

President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team is showing its hostility toward lawful firearm owners by “weeding out” job applicants who own firearms themselves, a Second Amendment group says.

The Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA) notes that question 59 – part of a 63-item questionnaire given to Obama administration job applicants – asks for information about firearms owned by the applicant and his or her family.

Found in the questionnaire’s “Miscellaneous” section, question 59 reads, “Do you or any members of your immediate family own a gun? If so, provide complete ownership and registration information. Has the registration ever lapsed? Please also describe how and by whom it is used and whether it has been the cause of any personal injuries or property damage.”

Other questions in the Miscellaneous section ask about the applicant’s postings on Facebook and MySpace Web sites; health and medical status; associations with groups that could be used against the applicant; and any other information that could prove embarrassing to the applicant.

Although it’s not clear that gun ownership would disqualify a job applicant, ISRA says question 59 shows the Obama team’s “distaste” for firearm owners.

“Question 59 provides clear insight into how Obama and his people perceive firearm owners,” said ISRA Executive Director Richard Pearson. “The questionnaire poses a number of questions asking the applicant to reveal any unethical activities, or embarrassing Internet chats, then wraps up by asking if anyone in the applicant’s family owns a firearm. Obviously, Obama feels that owning a firearm is akin to talking dirty in Internet chat rooms.”

Pearson says the attitude is not surprising, given that Obama – as an Illinois State senator — voted for SB1195, which included a provision calling for gun owners to be registered in the same manner as sex offenders.

“Once again, we have to ask ourselves just what candidate Obama was talking about when he said he has ‘respect’ for the 2nd Amendment,” said Pearson.

ISRA, which describes itself as an advocate of safe, lawful and responsible firearms ownership, has posted a copy of the questionnaire on its Web site.

The National Rifle Association also noted the anti-Second Amendment implications of the Obama’s team’s employment questionnaire:

“[A]s this litmus test shows, they have every intention of putting together an administration that is hostile to firearms ownership and to Second Amendment rights,” said NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre.

“One of their first official acts is to make a list of gun owners among their own employees. It proves where their hearts are. It shows what their philosophy is. This is more proof that this administration is coming after our freedom and NRA stands ready.”

Here we go again, sound familiar? Another home invasion, rape, torture, and killing by those members of the “african american” community who embrace thug culture. The target, a interracial couple.

The Knoxville Horror with a Twist-Four Black Marines Murder Interracial Couple In Winchester, CA; MSM Censors Details, Of Course

By Nicholas Stix

These are the best of times for white-hating black women. They can openly proclaim their beliefs, and be rewarded and praised for them, (like author Denene Millner whose The Sistahs’ Rules stands foursquare against interracial dating) and commit terrible crimes, without so much as being arrested, like Crystal Gayle Mangum, the Duke hoaxer..

But for decent black women, these are the worst of times. If they hate whites insufficiently, they must keep this to themselves. As for romance, one-third of black men are criminals, and many of the rest are thugs. But let a black woman look where the good men are, among whites and Asians, and she risks ostracism … or worse.

Which brings us to the sad case of Jan Pawel and Quiana Pietrzak. Jan Pawel Pietrzak, 24, was a Polish-born Catholic. They don’t come much whiter, this side of Ireland. His family immigrated here when he was 10, and Jan Pawel (“John Paul” in English, after the late Pope) grew up in working-class, white and Asian Bensonhurst, Brooklyn.

Pietrzak responded to 9/11 by enlisting in the United States Marine Corps where, as a helicopter mechanic, he rose to the rank of sergeant. Sgt. Pietrzak loved the Corps. He was serving out of Miramar Air Station, in San Diego.

Pietrzak met his future bride, the former Quiana Jenkins, an African American, “three years ago at a party for Marines being deployed to Iraq”, according to the New York Daily News: Brooklyn Marine sergeant & wife tortured, slain in Calif.; 4 of his men are arrested, by Corky Siemaszko, updated November 6th, 2008.

They were wed just a few months ago, and had just bought a five-bedroom house off the foreclosure market, in Winchester, in Riverside County. The cute, petite, 26-year-old bride was studying to become a doctor.

The couple was bound and gagged and tortured. The wife was “sexually assaulted”. Then husband and wife were each killed, “execution-style”, with a bullet to the back of the head. In an attempt to cover their tracks, the killers set fire to the living room.

The victims were discovered on October 15. When Mrs. Pietrzak failed to show up for work, her mother called the Sheriff’s Office, which sent deputies to find her.

Four suspects have been charged in the case:

“Pvt. Emrys John, 18, of Maryland; Lance Cpl. Tyrone Miller, 20, of North Carolina; Pvt. Kevin Darnell Cox, 20, of Tennessee, and Pvt. Kesaun Sykes, 21, of California.”

Property belonging to the Pietrzaks was found in some or all of the suspects’ barracks at Camp Pendleton. All are black; John and Miller served under Sgt. Pietrzak. John was reportedly named as the shooter by the three other suspects.

” ‘They’re monsters,” [the bride's mother] Faye Jenkins told the Daily News. “They’re monsters….

“Investigators said the motive for murder was ‘financial gain.’ Neither mother believes that.

” ‘When I found out what they did to them, it was like they killed me, too,’ [Pietrzak's mother] Pietrzak-Varga said….

“Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak, 26, who worked for the county’s Black Infant Care Center, was reluctant to date a Marine. But Pietrzak wooed her, and they were married in August.

” ‘They were in love,” her mother-in-law said. ‘It didn’t matter to them that they had different skin colors.’

“The bride wore her favorite white Converse sneakers, and she was still in the process of writing thank-you cards when she was killed.

” ‘She was our only child and my best friend,” Faye Jenkins said. ‘He was like my son. He was so proud to be a Marine. But when he was off the base, he was my son…. ‘

“Pietrzak’s mother said she can’t understand how Marines could have committed such a crime.

” ‘Don’t the Marines screen out people like this?’ she said. ‘Didn’t they know they had murderers under their roof?’

Unfortunately, as Duncan Hengest showed in his first-person report in January’s American Renaissance, in the name of diversity, the U.S. Military does not screen out racist murderers or monsters if they are are members of protected minority groups. (James Fulford pointed out last year that according to CBS News “Military regulations disqualify members of hate groups from enlisting, but there is no specific ban on members of street gangs.”)

ABC’s Chris Cuomo: The biggest question remains, Why? These men are Marines, men built on a foundation of honor and duty. So, how could they do something so terrible to one of their own?

Wife’s mother: How could they? He was one of their own. He was their brother.

Cuomo: The simple answer here is robbery, but the motive is expected to go beyond that. The violent nature of the killing, the allegation that these men brutalized the wife before killing her. So, there’s more reporting to be done, to find out what’s really behind this. [Marines Suspected in Sergeant's Slaying: Sgt. Jan Pietrzak and Wife Quiana Were Gagged, Bound and Executed, by Lee Ferran, Good Morning America, November 7, 2008][PB1]

(Despite Cuomo’s opinion, ABC doesn’t seem to have “more reporting”.)

The simple answer is to Jenkins-Pietrzak’s mother: the killers did not consider a white man “one of their own”-especially one who had engaged in interracial marriage, “Semper Fi” and the USMC be damned.

The most ludicrous, yet expected part of the report on the Winchester Atrocity is the claim by police that the killers were motivated by “financial gain”. The Pietrzaks had no money. They’d sunk their modest means into their new house.

Plus, Riverside County DA Rod Pacheco’s comment on Good Morning America undermines the official story: “To burglarize their home and then to treat them in the way they did before they died and to murder them-it’s hard for our minds to comprehend this kind of savagery.”

Let’s see. In order to make some fast money, four strong “Marines” target a couple that they know have no money, torture them, rape the wife, murder them, and torch their house?

I cannot see a stronger disjunction than that between the official motive, the victims, and the atrocity. Had “financial gain” been the killers’ true motive, they would have donned masks and gloves, and knocked over a convenience store.

But in the Bizarro World of Politically Correct Criminology, I suppose it all makes perfect sense.

And the New York Daily News still started a story which included the torture, murder, and sexual assault with the words “They did it for the money.”[Confession In Torture, Slay Of Brooklyn-Raised Marine Sergeant And Wife, By Nancy Dillon In Murrieta, Calif., And Corky Siemaszko In New York, November 7th 2008, ]

Even Good Morning America’s narrator, the usually PC Chris Cuomo, refused to buy the official story. [Video]

As for the “sexual assault,” which is a euphemism for either sodomy or rape, veteran journalist Fred Reed had something to say about that in the case of the Knoxville Horror that resonates in all black-on-white torture-sex assault-murders:

“… note that rape is not primarily a sexual crime. Any man who wants to get laid can find a hooker for twenty bucks on a downtown street corner. It’s easy. Men know that it’s easy. Rape? You don’t risk life in jail on a murder charge for a few minutes of lousy sex.

You do it from hatred. If you really hate whites, you make a white girl give you a b— –b in front of her boyfriend. It’s a kick. On your knees, b—h….Then you wash out her mouth with Drano or whatever to destroy the evidence. [Diversity and its Prospects: The Hazards of Regarding Lying as a Solution, by Fred Reed, June 24, 2007. ]

It’s not clear whether Quiana Jenkins-Pietrzak was orally sodomized, but whether or not she also endured that crime, she was almost certainly raped. Lee Ferran’s Good Morning America Web story reports, “All four said that 26-year-old Jenkins-Pietrzak was sexually assaulted, but each suspect said the other three did it. Lance Cpl. Kesaun Sykes, 21, reportedly confessed to cutting off her clothes.”

The Daily News’ Siemaszko also neglected to mention the suspects’ race, and his editor did not see fit to provide pictures of them. (Nothing new there.)

Good Morning America’s video report provides pictures of the suspects, and is supplemented by Ferran’s accompanying text.

Since the suspects have all pleaded not guilty, their lawyers will surely insist that their confessions were coerced, and will likely claim that the incriminating evidence is the “tainted fruit” of illegal searches and seizures.

Unlike in the Knoxville Horror, in this case the sexual assault victim was black. But she was married to a white man, and so the racial degradation factor was present, plus the racial revenge factor, with the killers punishing both husband and wife for crossing the color line.

But since the murder-torture-sex assault-robbery-arson suspects are all black, the authorities have said nothing about race, the national media (with the honorable exception of ABC) have refused to cover the story at all, and even the Daily News suppressed the racial facts. It’s F.U.B.A.R., but it’s also S.O.P.

And under Barack Hussein “Obama”, I predict this pattern will become ever more frequent.

(To those readers who have been sending me stories of racial atrocities, many thanks. I apologize if you have yet to see my treatments of them. I just can’t keep up. But please keep sending them. If you don’t quit, I won’t quit.)